Russia and Japan: to the question of the historical tradition of cultural in-teraction
Abstract
The study raises the question of the importance, the content and the way of transmission of historical tradition during the cultural interference. It regards historical tradition as a process of cultural heritage conservation and its renewal in later generations through acceptance of cultural objects and moral values. To compare the process of cultural interference Russia and Japan were chosen. Despite having significant differences in content, both cultures have one important trait in common: at the beginning of formation of the national identity each county was involved into intensive cultural adoption of Eastern and West European cultural forms. The study shows that Russia and Japan had similar in form, but completely specific in content periods of adoption and they managed to conserve and strengthen their national identities. It also demonstrates that Russia and Japan have similar traits in the way of borrowing of European cultural forms. First of all, both countries dealt with prejudices, fought with the economic lag and suffered from the need to educate people. Secondly, both cultures showed their ability to transform the adopted forms and assimilate in an appropriate way without any loss of their national identity. The similarities in the process of interaction in the Russian and Japanese history help to show some differences concerning the content and geopolitics. For example, Japanese elite group, as compared with that of Russia, managed to be more pragmatic and adopted only European technical innovations without letting alien ideas and values penetrate into its cultural centre
References
Berdyaev, N.A. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma [The origins and meaning of Russian communism], Moscow: Nauka, 1990.
Berdyaev, N.A. Russkaya ideya [The Russian idea], Moscow: AST, Astrel': Poligrafizdat, 2010.
Golovnin, D.N. Yaponiya prezhde i teper' [Japan before and now], in Russkaya mys-l': Ezheme-syachnoe literaturno-politicheskoe izdanie. God 24-j. Kn. VII. [Russian Thought: Monthly literary and political edition. Year 24th. Book VII], Moscow: Tip. T-va I. N. Kushnereva i Ko, 1903.
Danilevskij, N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow: Institut russkoj civilizacii, 2008.
Kavelin, K.D. Vzglyad na yuridicheskij byt drevnej Rusi [A look at the legal state of ancient Russia], in Kavelin, K.D. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected works], vol. 1, St. Petersburg, 1897.
Kavelin, K.D. Nash umstvennyj stroj [Our mental system], in Kavelin, K.D. So-branie sochinenij [Collected works], vol. 3, St. Petersburg, 1899.
Kavelin, K.D. Filosofiya i nauka v Evrope i u nas [Philosophy and science in Europe and in Russia], in Kavelin, K.D. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected works], vol. 3, St. Petersburg, 1899.
Kavelin, K.D. Zloby dnya [The topics of the day], in Kavelin, K.D. Sobranie so-chinenij [Collected works], vol. 3, St. Petersburg, 1899.
Klyuchevskij, V.O. Dva vospitaniya [Two educations], in Klyuchevskij, V.O. So-branie sochinenij v 9 t. [Collected works in 9 vol.], vol. 9. Moscow: Mysl', 1990.
Kul'turogenez i kul'turnoe nasledie [Cultural genesis and cultural heritage], Mos-cow, St. Petersburg: Centr gumanisticheskih iniciativ, 2014.
Kul'turologiya [Culturology], eds. Yu. N. Solonin, M. S. Kagan, Moscow: Vysshee obrazovanie, 2007.
Mihajlova, E.E. Russkij pozitivizm na rubezhe XIX–XX vekov: Problema soci-okul'turnogo razvitiya [Russian positivism at the turn of the 19th and 20th centu-ries: the problem of socio-cultural development]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGOU, 2004.
Nikonov, L.A. Problema vzaimosvyazi gosudarstva i obshchestva v filosofii russ-kogo pozitivizma: diss. … k. filos. n.: 09.00.03 [The problem of the relationship be-tween the state and society in the philosophy of Russian positivism: candidate dis-sertation, speciality 09.00.03], Tver', 2010.
Pronnikov, V.A., Ladanov, I.D. Yaponcy: Etnopsihologicheskie ocherki. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. [The Japanese: Ethnopsychological essays. 2nd ed., revised and en-larged], Moscow: Nauka, 1985.